Skip to main content

Morality

Where do we get our sense of right and wrong? How do we come to have a conscience that pricks us when we violate what we believe is moral?

Is right and wrong determined by some higher authority? And if it is, how did they determine what was right and wrong ...did they just make it up arbitrarily?


Christians believe in a highest authority -God- and that morality is determined through him. But not determined by some process of  random selection, but rather by the very standard of His character, His nature. 
God's character determining God's will. God’s holy and loving essence governing what He commands from His creation. 

Thus the values of morality are not based primarily upon what God has said, but upon who He is.

As humans created in this God's image, morality is part of our heritage. We have been purposely ingrained with a sensibility toward right and wrong; a conscience that finds its innate objectivity in Gods architecture of us. It is part of us. We are morally aware due to design; not evolution, not biological advantage; not even religion. Design.


However, as the bible says, we are also sinners. Such that, though we are morally sensitive and aware, we also make wrong choices that fall well outside the image of the God we were designed to reflect. The further we remove ourselves from God, the more awry our innate moral choices become, resembling less and less His perfect nature and will.


Like God, we exist and operate in the freedom of our own choices (free will). However, unlike God who alone is self-defining, we find our definition only in God's design of us. We were not designed to determine our own nature, but to reflect His; his image bearers. Therefore our freewill works to Gods purpose and our best interest only within the context of our design. Choices made outside that context violate God's purpose and our best interest.


Freewill, then, becomes the catalyst for evil. Not by its use, but its misuse. If evil is that which is opposed to Gods will (as determined by his nature), and Gods will is that we fulfil our design by reflecting His nature, then when we chose to not reflect that nature, we choose instead an evil nature (our will out of harmony with His).


The bible teaches that men have a conscience that either accuses or defends within them, call this a moral compass if you will. However it also speaks of mankind being dualistic in his moral nature (spiritual and carnal), desiring to do both right and wrong; God's will as well as our own. Further, it speaks of the danger of the carnal nature, for it has the ability to sear the conscience, as a hot iron sears flesh; until consciences ability to adequately influence us is lost, like seared nerves that no longer register pain.


In the lives of those with such a damaged moral compass, the bible speaks of situations where "good will be called evil, and evil good". In societies where such thinking has become predominant, anarchy is a reality. Not in the sense that there is no government, but moral anarchy, where each looks to their own damaged conscience for guidance, with no respect for a higher authority.


Such is mankind's tendency to do this -and history proves it so- that the bible instructs men and woman to heed moral absolutes as presented in scripture, and to resist the carnal temptation to elevate our own will above Gods.


Ultimately, though, Christians are not called to be morality police; as tempting as that is at times. Rather, we are called to bear the image and message of the One (Jesus), who can bridge the gap between what humanity has become morally, and the God-image we were designed to reflect.


John 3:17

For God did not send His Son into the world to condemn the world, but that the world through Him might be saved.

1 Peter 2:12

People who do not believe are living all around you and might say that you are doing wrong. Live such good lives that they will see the good things you do and will give glory to God on the day when Christ comes again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Pangs of Doubt

Have you ever suffered pangs of uncertainty regarding your faith? For some, uncertainties can grow into agonies of doubt, wrestling with the believers earnest desire to be sure of their faith. How does one become certain about their convictions? Can one? Of course, 'agony of doubt' is not unique to believers. Uncertainty is also found amongst unbelievers, especially those that hold truth as criteria for their particular world view(s). Can we know the truth with certainty? Jesus certainly believed we could. He clearly said in John 8:32 that, “You shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”  However, to understand the key to such certainty, one must read his words just prior to these: “ If you abide in my word , you are my disciples in deed. And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.” This is a profound truth, that unshakable conviction can only come about as one proves the truth of ones convictions by living acc...

Mud puddle illness

" Get some rest. If you haven't got your health, then you haven't got anything."  Count Rugen The Princess Bride Truly , if you don't have your health it's hard to appreciate the rest. An axiom of life most have experienced to some degree. Of course, many crushing waves can pummel us in the sea of life, taking their toll; rocking, upturning and threatening to sink us. But we cope, clinging more dearly to what remains afloat of ours lives.   Yet being robbed of health is more like a flood than a wave, a simultaneous inundation over our whole playing field. Whether it be from the pain, the delirium, or simply profound exhaustion, we no longer have the physical, nor often mental, ability to enjoy anything else of life. We simply breathe and hope. Of course, we're talking disabling illness here, the kind that sweeps you up and lays you very low. Not just for a few days or weeks, but months, years, longer... From my own experience of ...

Mohammed

Some believe that the terrorist drama currently being played out throughout the world is not about religion at all, but the result of the West's historically destabilising influence over those they wish to manipulate. On the other extreme are those seeking to place blame entirely upon the Arab world and its historically aggressive religion.  In truth, both are to blame. The West's bullying politics encourages acts of retaliation,   and it's human nature to retaliate.  However the flavour of Islam preferred by the fundamentalists seems intent on using violence as a winnowing fork of division, inflaming society so as to create an Us and Them dichotomy; Muslim and non-Muslim; and to force the “moderate Muslim” majority to make a choice, to pick a side. But why is that? Why are Islamic terrorists, in particular, so predictably extreme? Who or what are they looking to for guidance in how to retaliate against their perceived enemies? Mohammed Muslims, ...