Skip to main content

What is evil?

Evil is one of those immaterial concepts that everyone acknowledges but struggles to define. How do we know evil to be evil? By what standard do we measure it? And how do we agree on what that standard should be? Does evil exist in and of itself, or does it only exist as the result of something else?

Good questions.

Biblically, evil might be defined as that which opposes God's revealed will. Of course, humanity has expanded on this definition to encompass anything that opposes human will also; and sometimes the two are in harmony, but more often they are not.

However, sticking with first causes, if evil is that which opposes Gods will, then the question is not, 'How can a holy God allow evil to exist within his creation?' But rather, 'How can he not?' For how can you disallow the existence of something that only exists as the antithesis (opposite) of your own will? In other words, something that exists because something of you exists.

There is only three ways God could accomplish this:
  1. For Him NOT to have a will regarding anything He creates. For if He doesn't have a will, there can be no chance of anything in creation opposing it, and therefore no evil. Or,
  2. God refraining from creating anything with the ability to oppose his will; I.e. nobody gets a free-will but God. For if nothing in creation has a free-will, nothing can oppose Gods, and therefore no evil. Or,
  3. God destroying any free-willed being the moment before they choose to oppose his will; and thus preventing evil entering into the world.
Of course, the first option would render anything God created both purposeless and pointless. The second would require God create only tools and/or toys. And the third, that God condemn a sinner before they actually sinned ...Hmm.

Bottom line: to require God to keep evil out of his creation is to desire God to be less than He is, or to desire humans to be less then they are. We can get hung up, or we can accept that God has a will. A will we can seek and fulfil or ignore and oppose. Of course, if we choose to ignore Gods will, we become part of the problem of evil. For to exist, evil requires two opposing wills. Doesn't it make more sense that we amend our wills rather than expect God to amend His.

For I have come down from heaven not to do my will but to do the will of him who sent me. And this is the will of him who sent me, that I shall lose none of all those he has given me, but raise them up at the last day. For my Father’s will is that everyone who looks to the Son and believes in him shall have eternal life, and I will raise them up at the last day.” [Jesus]
John 6:38-40

For it is better, if it is God’s will, to suffer for doing good than for doing evil. For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, to bring you to God. He was put to death in the body but made alive in the Spirit.
1 Peter 3:17-18

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating Nuances

Religious or otherwise , all men possess an inherent moral compass. A conscience that either accuses or defends within them. However, possessing a compass is not the only prerequisite to morality.  To be truly moral, one must have confidence that their compass points true, and then, by virtue of trust, let it lead them. I've read that magnetic compasses are easily offset by local magnetic fields, and that these nuances of deviation have lost many a man to sea. Thankfully, this interference can be neutralised by placing correcting magnets around the compass. Analogously , the Bible tells us that we live in a morally hazardous world, where man's fallen nature interferes with his moral compass tempting deviance from what is good in Gods sight; and many a man has been lost due to it. However, to neutralise this influence, God has made provision through Christ, and his word. Together they become, for us, the correcting magnets for our moral compass. Many cite the evil th...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Conundrum of Contentment

Someone once related a story to me regarding a memorable highlight of their oblivious youth. Oblivious because what they perceived as the highlight, was in fact one of the most stressful periods of their parents life.  It was the 1950's, a time of widespread decline throughout Africa. Having lost his job, the father was forced to sell the family home. With nothing left but car and caravan, and no choice but to travel the country in search of livelihood, daily necessities soon became more a prayer than an expectation. Yet the parents worries were their own. For the two sons, life had become an adventure, a seemingly endless holiday, travelling by caravan no less. Schooling was on hold, playtime was plentiful. Therefore, with food and clothing these two boys were content. Doesn't perspective change everything, not least of all our experience of contentment. Discontent is a common sensation, regardless of age, gender, or income. But it...
Post a Comment
Read more

Influence

It is not necessarily the great things we hope to achieve that will impact others most, but the consistent manner in which we perform the everyday things. When reminiscing, very few find they've lived the dream anticipated in youth; grey hairs as much a sign of angst as wisdom it seems. Yet years do add their age-etched counsel into our lives, and few more poignantly than the effects of our influence. In fact nothing proves this more forcefully than times passage. We see it in our children as they age, unwittingly imitating us; faults and all. We see it in other relationships, both thriving and dead, dependent upon the effort we put into them. We see it even in our own bodies, the undeniable testimony of decades of care and/or neglect. As historically insignificant as we might think ourselves, our influence will continue long after we are gone. For most of us that influence will not be established via news worthy feats, but in going through the mundane motions ...
Post a Comment
Read more