Skip to main content

Mohammed

Some believe that the terrorist drama currently being played out throughout the world is not about religion at all, but the result of the West's historically destabilising influence over those they wish to manipulate. On the other extreme are those seeking to place blame entirely upon the Arab world and its historically aggressive religion. 

In truth, both are to blame. The West's bullying politics encourages acts of retaliation, and it's human nature to retaliate. However the flavour of Islam preferred by the fundamentalists seems intent on using violence as a winnowing fork of division, inflaming society so as to create an Us and Them dichotomy; Muslim and non-Muslim; and to force the “moderate Muslim” majority to make a choice, to pick a side.

But why is that? Why are Islamic terrorists, in particular, so predictably extreme? Who or what are they looking to for guidance in how to retaliate against their perceived enemies?

Mohammed


Muslims, like Christians, are people, and people are prone to messing up, prone to falling short of the exemplar left them by their mentors. However it needs addressing, that in regard one of those religions the current problem doesn't lay with the failings of its believers but the example left by their faiths founder (and I'm not referring to Jesus).

The founder of Islam was, without doubt, a warlord who established his religion and dealt with his enemies through force of arms and terror tactics. This is not a disputable point, it is well documented history conceded by Islam itself. Yet it rarely gets addressed as central to the terrorist problem. Rather, main stream media seems intent on separating the Islamic terrorist from any semblance of Islam; and least of all its founder. Such a failing is equivalent to lambasting the soldiers of the Jewish death camps while denying that their Fuehrer influenced their actions.

For actions speak louder than words; a truth we all accept. A mother warning their child of the dangers of smoking while lighting up her seventh cigarette, is delusional. No fair minded individual would hold the child guilty for imitating the mothers actions over her words. After all, we imitate whom we most respect. And millions of people around the globe respect Mohammed as the chief prophet of God. Are we surprised, then, that an element of his followers so respects him that they imitate the violence he demonstrated repeatedly in life towards his enemies in Allah's name; even if such violence contradicts some of the things he said (though not all the things he said).


If anyone needs to be held to account, to be proven true or false, it is a religions founder.


Christians, by and large, tolerate a transparent open critique of Christ. Likewise, Mohammed needs to be unveiled. The truth about his life, words and actions needs to be expounded and critiqued without fear of reprisal and abuse. Yet, surprisingly in our society, that abuse comes from our very own media. A media that seems intent on whitewashing Mohammed out of the problem, and berating anyone who would suggest otherwise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Navigating Nuances

Religious or otherwise , all men possess an inherent moral compass. A conscience that either accuses or defends within them. However, possessing a compass is not the only prerequisite to morality.  To be truly moral, one must have confidence that their compass points true, and then, by virtue of trust, let it lead them. I've read that magnetic compasses are easily offset by local magnetic fields, and that these nuances of deviation have lost many a man to sea. Thankfully, this interference can be neutralised by placing correcting magnets around the compass. Analogously , the Bible tells us that we live in a morally hazardous world, where man's fallen nature interferes with his moral compass tempting deviance from what is good in Gods sight; and many a man has been lost due to it. However, to neutralise this influence, God has made provision through Christ, and his word. Together they become, for us, the correcting magnets for our moral compass. Many cite the evil th...

The Conundrum of Contentment

Someone once related a story to me regarding a memorable highlight of their oblivious youth. Oblivious because what they perceived as the highlight, was in fact one of the most stressful periods of their parents life.  It was the 1950's, a time of widespread decline throughout Africa. Having lost his job, the father was forced to sell the family home. With nothing left but car and caravan, and no choice but to travel the country in search of livelihood, daily necessities soon became more a prayer than an expectation. Yet the parents worries were their own. For the two sons, life had become an adventure, a seemingly endless holiday, travelling by caravan no less. Schooling was on hold, playtime was plentiful. Therefore, with food and clothing these two boys were content. Doesn't perspective change everything, not least of all our experience of contentment. Discontent is a common sensation, regardless of age, gender, or income. But it...

Influence

It is not necessarily the great things we hope to achieve that will impact others most, but the consistent manner in which we perform the everyday things. When reminiscing, very few find they've lived the dream anticipated in youth; grey hairs as much a sign of angst as wisdom it seems. Yet years do add their age-etched counsel into our lives, and few more poignantly than the effects of our influence. In fact nothing proves this more forcefully than times passage. We see it in our children as they age, unwittingly imitating us; faults and all. We see it in other relationships, both thriving and dead, dependent upon the effort we put into them. We see it even in our own bodies, the undeniable testimony of decades of care and/or neglect. As historically insignificant as we might think ourselves, our influence will continue long after we are gone. For most of us that influence will not be established via news worthy feats, but in going through the mundane motions ...